<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epic Fail &#8211; Cuil Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/</link>
	<description>What would OJ do?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Hi Meggan, thanks for your comment!

It&#039;s amazing how they could get things so wrong isn&#039;t it? The sites that talked about Cuil prior to its release were touting how good the new search functionality would be based on a new set of algorithms that are better than Googles. You&#039;d think that a fail of this magnitude would have got picked up well before launch.

I am also totally unimpressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meggan, thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how they could get things so wrong isn&#8217;t it? The sites that talked about Cuil prior to its release were touting how good the new search functionality would be based on a new set of algorithms that are better than Googles. You&#8217;d think that a fail of this magnitude would have got picked up well before launch.</p>
<p>I am also totally unimpressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meggan</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Meggan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I kept searching for things that definitely SHOULD have given me results (my terribly odd website name, for instance) and I got the Spanish version of my last.fm profile. Totally useless. I also came across the &quot;We didn&#039;t find any results&quot; page several times, which &lt;em&gt;rarely&lt;/em&gt; happens in Google, and I know there should be some results for what my search terms were.

Overall, I am not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept searching for things that definitely SHOULD have given me results (my terribly odd website name, for instance) and I got the Spanish version of my last.fm profile. Totally useless. I also came across the &#8220;We didn&#8217;t find any results&#8221; page several times, which <em>rarely</em> happens in Google, and I know there should be some results for what my search terms were.</p>
<p>Overall, I am not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>I shall do mate! I&#039;m doing my best. Will have some more Euler stuff done soon, and I&#039;ve got another one in the works to do with Suffix Trees and infinite-precision long division.

On a more relevant note: Cuil really does suck. Since I posted this I have actually managed to do a search. The results are truly horrendous. They&#039;re going to have to work very hard to save face after this &quot;launch&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall do mate! I&#8217;m doing my best. Will have some more Euler stuff done soon, and I&#8217;ve got another one in the works to do with Suffix Trees and infinite-precision long division.</p>
<p>On a more relevant note: Cuil really does suck. Since I posted this I have actually managed to do a search. The results are truly horrendous. They&#8217;re going to have to work very hard to save face after this &#8220;launch&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keef</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Keef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Arf!  Mate, you&#039;re going nuts in the blogging stakes lately.  Loads of posts in the last week or so.  Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arf!  Mate, you&#8217;re going nuts in the blogging stakes lately.  Loads of posts in the last week or so.  Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I tried, but I kept getting the message that the server is under load. Awesome for a search engine!.

Piece. Of. Shit.

Doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s made by ex-google employees and that it has a quadzillion indexed websites. If the results are shit, if you&#039;re lucky enough to get them, there&#039;s no point in using it. They&#039;re going to have to fight hard to get themselves out of this hole I reckon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried, but I kept getting the message that the server is under load. Awesome for a search engine!.</p>
<p>Piece. Of. Shit.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s made by ex-google employees and that it has a quadzillion indexed websites. If the results are shit, if you&#8217;re lucky enough to get them, there&#8217;s no point in using it. They&#8217;re going to have to fight hard to get themselves out of this hole I reckon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Useless. Search for my site, and I get a list of posts by me (good) with images that totally do not relate to me (EPIC FAIL).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useless. Search for my site, and I get a list of posts by me (good) with images that totally do not relate to me (EPIC FAIL).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OJ</title>
		<link>http://buffered.io/2008/07/29/epic-fail-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffered.io/?p=435#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>The net is going nuts with Cuil Fails. So I guess this isn&#039;t really news. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/439&quot; title=&quot;WiredPrairie&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This &lt;/a&gt;would have to take the cake so far though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The net is going nuts with Cuil Fails. So I guess this isn&#8217;t really news. <a href="http://www.wiredprairie.us/blog/index.php/archives/439" title="WiredPrairie" rel="nofollow">This </a>would have to take the cake so far though <img src='http://buffered.io/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Silk/emoticon_smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
