Comments on: Project Euler #10 http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/ What would OJ do? Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: gav http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1068 gav Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:12:43 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-1068 Not a problem. It was probably the only bit of that code I properly understood! Not a problem. It was probably the only bit of that code I properly understood!

]]> By: gav http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3248 gav Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:12:00 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-3248 Not a problem. It was probably the only bit of that code I properly understood! Not a problem. It was probably the only bit of that code I properly understood!

]]> By: OJ http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1069 OJ Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:13:32 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-1069 You are indeed correct my friend! It looks like they have changed the problem since I solved it the first time (I did this quite a while ago, just haven't got round to posting it). Thanks for noticing, I'll fix that up no :) Cheers! You are indeed correct my friend! It looks like they have changed the problem since I solved it the first time (I did this quite a while ago, just haven’t got round to posting it). Thanks for noticing, I’ll fix that up no :) Cheers!

]]> By: OJ http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3249 OJ Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:13:00 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-3249 You are indeed correct my friend! It looks like they have changed the problem since I solved it the first time (I did this quite a while ago, just haven't got round to posting it). Thanks for noticing, I'll fix that up no :) Cheers! You are indeed correct my friend! It looks like they have changed the problem since I solved it the first time (I did this quite a while ago, just haven’t got round to posting it). Thanks for noticing, I’ll fix that up no :) Cheers!

]]> By: gav http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1070 gav Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-1070 Unless i'm mistaken "main = print $ sum (takeWhile (<1000000) primes)" iterates over the primes below one million but the question asks for below two million, or am I just being picky! :-) Unless i’m mistaken “main = print $ sum (takeWhile (<1000000) primes)” iterates over the primes below one million but the question asks for below two million, or am I just being picky! :-)

]]> By: gav http://buffered.io/2008/07/30/project-euler-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3250 gav Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:53:00 +0000 http://buffered.io/?p=439#comment-3250 Unless i'm mistaken "main = print $ sum (takeWhile (<1000000) primes)" iterates over the primes below one million but the question asks for below two million, or am I just being picky! :-) Unless i’m mistaken “main = print $ sum (takeWhile (<1000000) primes)” iterates over the primes below one million but the question asks for below two million, or am I just being picky! :-)

]]>